HomeNewsCommentariesDisplay

Lessons learned

MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. -- Exercise, Exercise, Exercise. What comes to mind when you hear those words? Do you wonder how your busy schedule is going to be complicated by responding to make-believe emergency events, diversions from normal operations and the dreaded lockdown from FPCON Delta? Maybe you sigh, realizing you will be drawn away from the real mission, or that performance report you are staffing will get slowed because everyone is out playing war games. Or perhaps you are resigned to the fact that exercises are a way of life in the military and you know that you'll somehow make it through yet another round of battle staff operations and exercise bomb threats. To be honest, I've had those feelings before. That is, until I observed, first hand, the wing's response to the tragic Snowbirds accident May 18. 

When the call came in that Friday afternoon, the wing's initial responders were already on scene, fighting the fire and establishing a cordon around the crash. Within minutes, the battle staff and emergency operations center were formed, poised to accomplish the myriad of tasks that would continue into the night. From reporting the incident to higher headquarters, disseminating information to the media and supporting on-scene personnel, to comforting our Canadian brothers-in-arms in their time of need, I was amazed at how smoothly the wing worked as a team to ensure all bases were covered. The transition from initial response to recovery operations was as efficient as any I had seen in any of our previous exercises. I wondered quietly how procedures and actions which were, at times, strained during exercises, worked so well when the real thing happened. 

Some would argue the artificiality of our exercises make them less than ideal for preparing our forces to respond to incidents. Even though exercises occur at the time and place of our choosing, working through the exercise play versus real-world operations, is quite constraining at times. What I've learned is that although somewhat hampered because of the high ops tempo of this wing, recent exercises have duly prepared us to respond to almost any contingency event. Discussions generated during exercises and the lessoned learned as a result of our practice scenarios transcend across the myriad of contingencies we could face in the future. On May 18, there were no restraints placed on the task at hand. The wing responded to the accident, while seamlessly executing the wing's operational mission. 

One thing is certain. This wing will continue to exercise its resources and personnel, and quite frankly, I welcome the next "opportunity to excel" in front of the exercise evaluation team. I now know better that responding to that artificial event could mean the difference between life and death in a given scenario. Whether it's a test of our security forces in protecting our assets, the daily training of our missile crews for our wartime mission, or an emergency management exercise for the entire wing, it is our responsibility to practice for the unimaginable event. Take note of lessons learned during exercises as well as from your response to the recent tragedy, use these to hone your war fighting skills even further, so that the next time you are called to respond, regardless of the nature or complexity of the event, you perform as well as you did that fateful day last month.
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.