Nine Airmen receive non-judicial punishments

  • Published
  • 341st Staff Judge Advocate's Office
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. --  The following individuals received non-judicial punishments during the month of February: 

- An airman first class from the 341st Missile Security Forces Squadron received a reduction to airman and suspended forfeiture of $200 pay for violating quarters authorization. 

- A senior airman from the 341st MSFS received a forfeiture of $250 pay for driving on Malmstrom with a revoked license. 

- A staff sergeant from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to senior airman and suspended forfeiture of $1,031 pay for two months for attempting to unlawfully enter the kitchen at a missile alert facility. 

- An airman first class from the 741st MSFS received a reduction to airman and 30 days restriction for failing to go to his or her appointed place of duty. 

- An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to airman and suspended forfeiture of $100 pay for writing a bad check in the amount of $2,504. 

- A senior airman from the 341st Civil Engineer Squadron received a forfeiture of $250 pay for two months, 30 days extra duty and a reprimand for assault. 

- An airman first class from the 741st MSFS received suspended reduction to airman, forfeiture of $250 pay for two months, 14 days restriction, seven days extra duty and a reprimand for driving under the influence of alcohol and speeding. The suspended reduction was later vacated for using tobacco in the dorms. 

- A senior airman from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to airman, suspended forfeiture of $500 pay and 30 days extra duty for disorderly conduct by being found in a compromising position with another member's spouse and for disobeying a no contact order. 

- A senior airman from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to airman first class, forfeiture of $864 pay for two months with one month suspended and 30 days extra duty for assault and consuming alcohol within eight hours prior to duty. 

NOTE: Punishments may vary from Airman to Airman. When deciding on an appropriate level of punishment, commanders take into consideration the member's oral and written presentation, the member's duty performance and past history of misconduct, the need for good order and discipline, and the nature and circumstances of the offenses.