Nine receive non-judicial punishments during May Published June 15, 2007 By Tech. Sgt. Deborah Frazier 341st Space Wing Judge Advocate's Office MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. -- The following individuals received non-judicial punishments during the month of May. A senior airman from the 341st Missile Security Forces Squadron received a suspended reduction to airman first class, forfeiture of $403 pay, 14 days extra duty and a reprimand for assault. An airman first class from the 490the Missile Squadron received a suspended reduction to airman, forfeiture of $150 pay for two months and suspended 45 days extra duty for driving on base while driving privileges were revoked. An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a suspended reduction to airman and a reprimand for sleeping on post. An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a suspended reduction to airman and a reprimand for sleeping on post. An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a suspended reduction to airman, forfeiture of $300 pay and restriction to base for 30 days for driving while drunk. An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to airman and 14 days extra duty for failing to go to an appointed place of duty, driving while drunk and drunk on duty. An airman first class from the 341st Civil Enginner Squadron received a reduction to airman, suspended forfeiture of $729 pay and restriction to base for 30 days for indecent assault. An airman from the 341st Logistics Readiness Squadron received a reduction to airman basic and 15 days extra duty for failing to go to an appointed place of duty and disrespect towards an NCO. An airman first class from the 741st Missile Security Forces Squadron received a reduction to airman, a suspended reduction to airman basic, forfeiture of $150 pay for two months, restriction to base for 30 days and a reprimand for violating a no contact order. NOTE: Punishments may vary from Airman to Airman. When deciding on an appropriate level of punishment, commanders take into consideration the member's oral and written presentation, the member's duty performance and past history of misconduct, the need for good order and discipline, and the nature and circumstances of the offenses.