Malmstrom military justice report for September

  • Published
Non-Judicial Punishment

An airman first class from the 341st Missile Wing received a reduction to the rank of airman, a suspended forfeiture of $754 pay per month for two months and 14 days of extra duty for failing to obey a lawful order.

An airman from the 741st Missile Security Forces Squadron received a reduction to airman basic, a suspended forfeiture of $673, restriction to base for 26 days, 26 days of extra duty and a reprimand for using marijuana.

An airman from the 341st Missile Security Forces Squadron received a reduction to the rank of airman basic for failing to go to the appointed place of duty on two occasions and dereliction of duty by drinking alcohol within eight hours of duty.

An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to the rank of airman basic for using marijuana and for wrongfully possessing Oxycodone.

An airman first class from the 341st MSFS received a reduction to the rank of airman, a suspended forfeiture of $300 pay for dereliction of duty by failing to carry a driver's license while operating a motor vehicle and for driving while under the influence of alcohol.

An airman first class from the 12th Missile Squadron received a reduction to the rank of airman basic and a reprimand for failing to obey a lawful order and dereliction of duty by not maintaining the missile alert facility kitchen in inspection order.

An airman basic from the 341st Security Forces Squadron received a suspended forfeiture of $200 and restriction to base for 60 days for failing to go to the place of duty, failing to obey a lawful order and being incapacitated for duty due to an overindulgence of alcohol.

An airman first class from the 819th RED HORSE Squadron received a reduction to the rank of airman, a suspended forfeiture of $754 pay and 30 days of extra duty for failing to go to the appointed place of duty and making a false official statement.

NOTE: Punishments may vary from Airman to Airman. When deciding on an appropriate level of punishment, commanders take into consideration the member's oral and written presentation, the member's duty performance and past history of misconduct, the need for good order and discipline, and the nature and circumstances of the offenses.