HomeNewsCommentariesDisplay

Diversity and the elephant in the room

MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. -- As a wing, we were asked, "What are you doing to support and enhance diversity in your unit--that which is frequently done and supported by action?" All levels of all organizations should answer this question. So as you look around your office, ask yourself, "What am I doing?"

Now, before you tell me you have no control over who ends up in your shop - you just take on whoever the Air Force Personnel Center sends you - read the question again. What are you doing to support and enhance diversity? When I ask this question, I don't just mean the obvious diversity - race, religion, gender or ethnicity; I want to know how you encourage diversity of thought. How do you ensure your diverse population gives voice to their different viewpoints?

As an Air Force, we have always valued innovation. If there is a better or more efficient way to get the job done (or our particular favorite, a new technology to be employed), we are the first to jump on board. Each service has its own culture, which in itself supports the value of diversity, and innovation is ours. Why am I talking about innovation in an article about diversity? I ask because the best innovations come from diverse groups. The more different people you can have look at a problem, the better your solution will be.

Have you heard the parable about four blind men who were tasked to describe an elephant based on touch alone? (A safety report waiting to happen, I know.) Each described the animal in a different way based on his perspective and location relative to the elephant: that the elephant was like a pipe (tusk), brush (tail), wall (body), pillar (leg). It took all four people, explaining their unique and limited perspective, to describe the elephant in the room accurately. When you are solving a problem, do you solicit many different perspectives? When you are attempting to innovate, who gets a voice?

Recently, in a wing exercise a captain spoke up to a room full of colonels. Those colonels were running a Crisis Action Team checklist and had just discussed a step regarding identifying foreign nationals requesting base entry. The captain, whose spouse is a foreign national, asked a question about military dependents - something the CAT hadn't considered when addressing that particular checklist step. It changed the scope of the checklist step for every member of the CAT and sparked an excellent conversation. As a result, the discussion made the team's actions more comprehensive and accurate. The CAT realized it had completely overlooked one whole portion of the elephant in the room. This discovery happened because individuals were encouraged to voice their unique perspective. It happened because the team encouraged diversity.

So what are you doing to encourage those different perspectives? When someone asks a question that takes the discussion off course, are you irritated or supportive? When someone plays "devil's advocate," do you shut him or her down? When someone points out a flaw in your decision, how do you react? To properly support and enhance diversity, you should applaud them.

When you think of diversity, don't only think of race, religion, gender or ethnicity; think instead of the valuable perspective you can gain when you have different people working together. To quote a popular country song, "Ever since the beginning, to keep the world spinning, it takes all kinds of kinds."
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.