DOD, Air Force nuclear force reviews consistent with force improvement efforts

WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Secretary of Defense announced the results of the Nuclear Enterprise Review during a press briefing at the Pentagon, Nov. 14.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, who ordered the comprehensive reviews of the entire nuclear enterprise earlier this year, said the reviews found systemic problems based on a lack of focus and resources.

"America's nuclear deterrent remains safe, secure and effective," Hagel assured, stating the DOD has been taking action on the challenges over the past several months. "The nuclear mission plays a critical role in ensuring the nation's safety. No other enterprise we have is more important."

The findings and recommendations from that review are consistent with the actions the Air Force and Air Force Global Strike Command are, and have been taking to improve its nuclear enterprise.

In February, Air Force Global Strike Command directed a Force Improvement Program (FIP), the architecture of which was designed to improve mission effectiveness, culture, morale and target areas in need of investment.

In May, Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James announced 100 percent manning for eight critical nuclear specialties by skill and location; assignment incentive pay and special duty assignment pay for select total-force nuclear career fields, approval of the Nuclear Deterrence Operations Service Medal, and has proposed elevating the AFGSC commander from a three-star to a four-star position and elevating the assistant chief of staff for strategic deterrence and nuclear integration to a three-star position.

"We've implemented improvements that have bubbled up from our Airmen in the field, Airmen who are closest to the mission," James said. "We value the nuclear mission as evidenced by making the appropriate investments in people, weapon systems and infrastructure. We have and will continue to work to identify funds to make needed improvements throughout our missile and bomber forces."

The FIP, which AFGSC Commander Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson originally initiated for the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) force in February, collected inputs straight from the Airmen performing the mission every day. That initial call for feedback generated more than 350 solutions to challenges spanning the ICBM operations. The bottom-up approach has allowed AFGSC to rapidly address Airmen's concerns and begin to enact change across the command.

AFGSC expanded the FIP to look at the bomber force to see where additional improvements can be made.

The FIP has evolved into a philosophy of continuous assessment and improvement that empowers Airmen who perform the nuclear mission and seeks to continue changing and improving the nuclear culture.

"Initiating the FIP meant we were 100 percent committed to empowering our people to tell us what is wrong so we can address those challenges," Wilson said. "With the Air Force's help, we have been able to begin closing the 'say-do' gap and prove to our Airmen the nuclear mission is the Air Force's number one mission."

Initial fixes run the gamut from empowering Airmen by pushing responsibility down to the appropriate level, to ensuring they have the right tools and parts available, to removing unnecessary administrative hurdles within the Personnel Reliability Program (PRP), to repairing old facilities where Airmen work.

"The most powerful aspect of (the) FIP is that every solution-driven piece of feedback came from the field -- they own this," Wilson said. "They are empowered to identify problems, work the solutions and then let leadership remove the obstacles to their success."

Additional improvements to date include:

Resources
· The Air Force moved more than $160 million in fiscal year 2014 to go after the urgent, near-term shortfalls.
· 100 percent effective manning was announced for eight critical nuclear career fields by skill and location.

Training
· ICBM operations training has been fundamentally overhauled, taking best practices from the aviation community, coupled with the appropriate rigors necessary in nuclear operations, to improve crew proficiency and foster a culture of continuous learning and critical self-assessment.
· Scores on monthly proficiency exams are no longer tracked or used for career advancement. Without lowering the standard, they have been replaced with a pass/fail score.
· Training has changed from a focus on teaching to the test, to a collaborative learning environment in which experienced crew members can share knowledge and expertise with their peers and subordinates, focused on performing the mission in the field.

Organization
· ICBM operational squadrons have reorganized, placing instructors in the squadrons to align responsibility and authority within the missile squadrons.

Development
· Called "3 + 3", a missileer will spend their initial three-year tour as a deputy crew member and then upgrade to a crew commander. During this first assignment, the focus is on mastering the weapon system by performing the mission in the field. This provides a stronger knowledge base before serving in their second three-year assignment as an instructor, evaluator and flight commander.
· The Air Force also implemented a cross-service exchange and will institute leadership development courses for missile crew commanders, instructors, evaluators, support personnel and squadron commanders.

Personnel Reliability Program (PRP)
· AFGSC has re-aligned the PRP to its original intent, shifting the paradigm to an 'up-until-down' construct by eliminating the practice of 'auto-suspending' an individual prior to a medical appointment and removing the administrative burden from the process.
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.